Test opon letnich 175/65 R14 na 2025
Wyniki testów
Ranking ogólnych osiągów
1.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance77%
2.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Bridgestone Turanza T00576%
3.
Nokian Wetproof
Nokian Wetproof73%
4.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS5270%
5.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
Toyo Proxes Comfort63%
6.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Kleber Dynaxer HP454%
7.
GT Radial FE2
GT Radial FE253%
8.
Giti Gitisynergy H2
Giti Gitisynergy H253%
9.
BFGoodrich Advantage
BFGoodrich Advantage52%
10.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 649%
11.
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
Matador MP47 Hectorra 344%
12.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Barum Bravuris 5 HM43%
Na suchej nawierzchni
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
35%
1.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS5282%
2.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Bridgestone Turanza T00577%
3.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance76%
4.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
Toyo Proxes Comfort73%
5.
Nokian Wetproof
Nokian Wetproof68%
6.
Giti Gitisynergy H2
Giti Gitisynergy H262%
7.
BFGoodrich Advantage
BFGoodrich Advantage62%
8.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Kleber Dynaxer HP449%
9.
GT Radial FE2
GT Radial FE249%
10.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 646%
11.
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
Matador MP47 Hectorra 337%
12.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Barum Bravuris 5 HM30%
Hamowanie na suchej nawierzchni
50%
1.
Giti GitiSynergy H2
87%
2.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
3.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
84%
4.
Nokian Wetproof
82%
5.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
76%
6.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
65%
7.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
64%
8.
GT Radial FE2
55%
9.
BFGoodrich Advantage
55%
10.
Continental EcoContact 6
48%
11.
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
44%
12.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
29%
Handling na suchej nawierzchni
50%
1.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
2.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
3.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
70%
4.
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
5.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
70%
6.
Nokian Wetproof
53%
7.
GT Radial FE2
43%
8.
Continental EcoContact 6
43%
9.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
35%
10.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Nie wystarczająco danych
Na mokrej nawierzchni
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
50%
1.
Nokian Wetproof
Nokian Wetproof75%
2.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance74%
3.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Bridgestone Turanza T00571%
4.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS5264%
5.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
Toyo Proxes Comfort55%
6.
GT Radial FE2
GT Radial FE254%
7.
Giti GitiSynergy H2
Giti GitiSynergy H250%
8.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Kleber Dynaxer HP447%
9.
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
Matador MP47 Hectorra 345%
10.
BFGoodrich Advantage
BFGoodrich Advantage39%
11.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 636%
Hamowanie na mokro
20%
1.
Nokian Wetproof
79%
2.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
3.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
4.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
61%
5.
BFGoodrich Advantage
56%
6.
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
60%
7.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
55%
8.
GT Radial FE2
49%
9.
Continental EcoContact 6
47%
10.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
47%
11.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
48%
12.
Giti GitiSynergy H2
39%
Handling na mokrej nawierzchni
20%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
2.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
3.
Nokian Wetproof
80%
4.
Giti GitiSynergy H2
72%
5.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
65%
6.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
60%
7.
GT Radial FE2
53%
8.
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
49%
9.
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
10.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
32%
11.
BFGoodrich Advantage
31%
12.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Nie wystarczająco danych
Aquaplaning wzdłużny
20%
1.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
78%
2.
Nokian Wetproof
74%
3.
GT Radial FE2
64%
4.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
61%
5.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
60%
6.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
59%
7.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
52%
8.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
47%
9.
BFGoodrich Advantage
37%
10.
Continental EcoContact 6
29%
Akwaplaning poprzeczny
20%
1.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
2.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
3.
Giti GitiSynergy H2
58%
4.
GT Radial FE2
59%
5.
Nokian Wetproof
58%
6.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
57%
7.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
52%
8.
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
54%
9.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
53%
10.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
40%
11.
BFGoodrich Advantage
35%
12.
Continental EcoContact 6
19%
Jazda po mokrych zakrętach
20%
1.
Nokian Wetproof
84%
2.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
3.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
4.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
69%
5.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
6.
Giti GitiSynergy H2
56%
7.
GT Radial FE2
46%
8.
Continental EcoContact 6
45%
9.
BFGoodrich Advantage
35%
10.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
36%
11.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Nie wystarczająco danych
Komfort
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
5%
1.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Kleber Dynaxer HP485%
2.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 685%
3.
Nokian Wetproof
Nokian Wetproof85%
4.
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
Matador MP47 Hectorra 381%
5.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
Toyo Proxes Comfort70%
6.
BFGoodrich Advantage
BFGoodrich Advantage57%
7.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance54%
8.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS5253%
9.
GT Radial FE2
GT Radial FE242%
10.
Giti GitiSynergy H2
Giti GitiSynergy H234%
11.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Bridgestone Turanza T00533%
12.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Barum Bravuris 5 HM30%
Hałas zewnętrzny
100%
1.
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
2.
Nokian Wetproof
85%
3.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
85%
4.
Matador MP47 Hectorra 3
81%
5.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
70%
6.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
54%
7.
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
8.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
53%
9.
GT Radial FE2
42%
10.
Giti GitiSynergy H2
34%
11.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
33%
12.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
30%
Komfort
0%
1.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
75%
2.
GT Radial FE2
59%
3.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
58%
4.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
47%
5.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Nie wystarczająco danych
6.
Nokian Wetproof
Nie wystarczająco danych
7.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Nie wystarczająco danych
8.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Nie wystarczająco danych
Ekonomia
1.
Continental EcoContact 6
Continental EcoContact 6100%
2.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
Bridgestone Turanza T00594%
3.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance86%
4.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
Kleber Dynaxer HP472%
5.
BFGoodrich Advantage
BFGoodrich Advantage68%
6.
Nokian Wetproof
Nokian Wetproof53%
7.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS5252%
8.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
Toyo Proxes Comfort50%
9.
GT Radial FE2
GT Radial FE249%
Opór toczenia
100%
1.
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
2.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
3.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
4.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
72%
5.
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
6.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
55%
7.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
52%
8.
Nokian Wetproof
53%
9.
GT Radial FE2
49%
10.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Nie wystarczająco danych
Przebieg
0%
1.
Continental EcoContact 6
90%
2.
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
3.
Bridgestone Turanza T005
63%
4.
Kleber Dynaxer HP4
61%
5.
GT Radial FE2
55%
6.
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
7.
Toyo Proxes Comfort
57%
8.
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
51%
9.
Nokian Wetproof
38%
10.
Barum Bravuris 5 HM
Nie wystarczająco danych
