Test opon zimowych 175/60 R18 na 2025
Wyniki testów
Ranking ogólnych osiągów
1.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Continental WinterContact TS 87090%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 382%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 677%
4.
Michelin Alpin 6
Michelin Alpin 672%
5.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Semperit Speed-Grip 565%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS01
Falken EuroWinter HS0160%
7.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS0257%
Na suchej nawierzchni
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
20%
1.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS0292%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 381%
3.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Continental WinterContact TS 87081%
4.
Michelin Alpin 6
Michelin Alpin 674%
5.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 662%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS01
Falken EuroWinter HS0161%
7.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Semperit Speed-Grip 561%
Hamowanie na suchej nawierzchni
50%
1.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
93%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
3.
Michelin Alpin 6
76%
4.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
71%
5.
Falken EuroWinter HS01
65%
6.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
54%
7.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
50%
Handling na suchej nawierzchni
50%
1.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
3.
Michelin Alpin 6
71%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
71%
5.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
71%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS01
57%
7.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
Nie wystarczająco danych
Na mokrej nawierzchni
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
40%
1.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Continental WinterContact TS 87088%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 681%
3.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 381%
4.
Michelin Alpin 6
Michelin Alpin 670%
5.
Falken Eurowinter HS01
Falken Eurowinter HS0164%
6.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Semperit Speed-Grip 561%
7.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS0255%
Hamowanie na mokro
20%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
93%
2.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
80%
3.
Michelin Alpin 6
78%
4.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
5.
Falken Eurowinter HS01
66%
6.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
61%
7.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
51%
Handling na mokrej nawierzchni
20%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
95%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
90%
3.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
4.
Michelin Alpin 6
80%
5.
Falken Eurowinter HS01
52%
6.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
41%
7.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
Nie wystarczająco danych
Aquaplaning wzdłużny
20%
1.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
2.
Falken Eurowinter HS01
86%
3.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
84%
4.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
5.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
66%
6.
Michelin Alpin 6
64%
7.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
57%
Akwaplaning poprzeczny
20%
1.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
2.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
81%
3.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
4.
Falken Eurowinter HS01
72%
5.
Michelin Alpin 6
59%
6.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
57%
7.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
47%
Jazda po mokrych zakrętach
20%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
96%
2.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
3.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
4.
Michelin Alpin 6
70%
5.
Falken Eurowinter HS01
45%
6.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
46%
7.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
Nie wystarczająco danych
Na śniegu
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
30%
1.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Continental WinterContact TS 87082%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 674%
3.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 372%
4.
Michelin Alpin 6
Michelin Alpin 663%
5.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Semperit Speed-Grip 558%
6.
Falken Eurowinter HS01
Falken Eurowinter HS0148%
7.
Falken Eurowinter HS02
Falken Eurowinter HS0224%
Trakcja na śniegu
33%
1.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
84%
2.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
3.
Michelin Alpin 6
77%
4.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
76%
5.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
45%
6.
Falken Eurowinter HS01
39%
7.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
32%
Hamowanie na śniegu
33%
1.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
2.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
74%
3.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
4.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
63%
5.
Falken EuroWinter HS01
59%
6.
Michelin Alpin 6
51%
7.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
25%
Handling na śniegu
33%
1.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%
2.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
68%
3.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
64%
4.
Michelin Alpin 6
62%
5.
Falken EuroWinter HS01
48%
6.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
58%
7.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
Nie wystarczająco danych
Obracanie na śniegu
0%
1.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
2.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
3.
Michelin Alpin 6
57%
4.
Falken EuroWinter HS01
56%
5.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
58%
6.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Nie wystarczająco danych
7.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
Nie wystarczająco danych
Komfort
Waga w ogólnej ocenie:
5%
1.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Continental WinterContact TS 87082%
2.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 376%
3.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS0269%
4.
Michelin Alpin 6
Michelin Alpin 660%
5.
Falken Eurowinter HS01
Falken Eurowinter HS0157%
6.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Semperit Speed-Grip 552%
7.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 632%
Hałas zewnętrzny
100%
1.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
82%
2.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
76%
3.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
69%
4.
Michelin Alpin 6
60%
5.
Falken Eurowinter HS01
57%
6.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
52%
7.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
32%
Hałas wewnętrzny
0%
1.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
85%
2.
Michelin Alpin 6
60%
3.
Falken Eurowinter HS01
55%
4.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
50%
5.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Nie wystarczająco danych
6.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
Nie wystarczająco danych
7.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Nie wystarczająco danych
Komfort
0%
1.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%
2.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
82%
3.
Michelin Alpin 6
70%
4.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
59%
5.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Nie wystarczająco danych
6.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
Nie wystarczająco danych
7.
Falken EuroWinter HS01
Nie wystarczająco danych
Ekonomia
1.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
Semperit Speed-Grip 591%
2.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
Continental WinterContact TS 87088%
3.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 369%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Bridgestone Blizzak 663%
5.
Michelin Alpin 6
Michelin Alpin 659%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS01
Falken EuroWinter HS0123%
Opór toczenia
100%
1.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
91%
2.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
88%
3.
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
69%
4.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
63%
5.
Michelin Alpin 6
59%
6.
Falken EuroWinter HS01
23%
7.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
Nie wystarczająco danych
Przebieg
0%
1.
Michelin Alpin 6
95%
2.
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
3.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
81%
4.
Semperit Speed-Grip 5
76%
5.
Falken Eurowinter HS01
62%
6.
FALKEN EUROWINTER HS02
56%
7.
Bridgestone Blizzak 6
Nie wystarczająco danych
